On Friday last week I posted a blog entry entitled ‘Join the Online Protest – “World’s Oldest Oppression” Conference’ about the efforts of local peer sex worker organisation Vixen Collective to protest an anti sex work conference here in Melbourne, Australia.
Individual sex workers and sex worker allies have joined Vixen Collective in protesting online – primarily on Twitter – RMIT University’s choice play host to a conference that brings together a range of anti sex work figures, outspoken in their support of either the Swedish Model of sex work criminalisation (sometimes called the Nordic Model) or of outright abolition of sex work.
It’s always interesting to see what reaction there will be online to a protest by sex workers. Interesting, but often predictable.
Anti sex work groups have a tendency to claim that they themselves are being “silenced” when sex workers speak out for our human rights.
Since the protest started, a member of local pro-Swedish Model organisation NorMAC, Simone Watson, who once likened sex workers to “meat” has published an opinion piece in the Tasmanian Times where Vixen Collective, an unfunded peer sex worker organisation is referred to as a “pro sex trade group”.
Simone Watson, also in the Tasmanian Times, makes the claim that I personally have “launched an online campaign to discredit the voices of prostitution Survivors”. Given that I have done no such thing, as is demonstrable from reading the actual post – I would suggest that Ms Watson retract her defamatory statement.
In comments on Twitter by anti sex work folk, I noticed just this morning, the standard refrain that their side is being “silenced” by sex workers.
Of the listed speakers for the conference – Julie Bindel, Rachel Moran, Dr Caroline Norma and Melinda Tankard Reist – all are published authors, at least one has tenure at a University, and all make regular appearances as public speakers on the subject of the criminalisation of sex work – of which it is to be expected, that some appearances are paid.
These are not people who are silent. These are not people who are lacking in a platform. To suggest that an online protest by individual sex workers, an unfunded peer sex worker organisation, and sex worker allies – is in any way “silencing” people with this degree of power, social capital, and continuing access to a variety of platforms is absurd.
But it is a useful tool in continuing to silence sex workers, which really is the point of the exercise isn’t it, when your end goal is abolishing sex work?
Want to join the protest?
Take action online:
RMIT is on both Twitter and FaceBook
- Take action on Twitter using the hashtags #RMIT2016 and #sexwork
Include the Twitter handle @RMIT to Tweet directly at RMIT
- Take action on RMIT’s FaceBook Page here: https://www.facebook.com/RMITuniversity/
Looking for info when arguing with anti’s or debunking their arguments? Check out ‘A Pocket Guide to Dealing With Anti’s Online’
5 thoughts on “The Sound of Silencing Sex Workers”
Pingback: Visable Woman - Jezabel
Pingback: RMIT plays host to hate (again) | sexliesducttape
Pingback: “Pieces of meat” & balance in journalism | sexliesducttape
Pingback: Re: “debate” – Sadie Slyfox
Reblogged this on Pycraftsworld’s Weblog.